Study Guide
for students attempting to test out of ENGL 1120
The
test qualifying you to take ENGL 2030 without finishing ENGL 1120 first will
focus on Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, the preface to Part IV, 11, 12, 13, and 14 in Understanding English Grammar, 8th
edition, by Kolln and Funk. In addition, the test
will draw on a few other pages in Kolln and Funk and from course
PowerPoint slideshows referenced below.
The actual exam will be about half the length of this
one. Questions will cover the same material, but will not be exactly the same
as the questions presented here for practice.
If you wish to test out, make an appointment with Dr.
Julie Simon (simon@suu.edu) to take the exam
in the testing center no later than the end of the first week of class.
You may attempt the test-out exam only once. You must
pass it with a score of 73 percent or higher to proceed to ENGL 2030.
Part
I: Descriptive vs. Prescriptive Grammar—15 percent of the total exam score
1. Does the following sentence represent
a descriptive or prescriptive rule of English? Specify two characteristics that
justify your answer, and then rewrite the rule into its opposite (prescriptive
or descriptive) version:
To be correct, you should use “fewer”
before countable nouns such as “apples.” The word “less” is correct only with uncountable nouns such as
“fog.”
KEY: The sentence
represents a PRESCRIPTIVE rule of grammar (Grammar III) since it is concerned
to correct speakers from using a structure (“less apples”) that is used by many
native speakers and “sounds right” to them.
Prescriptive rules have to be taught in this explicit way to native
speakers who follow a different linguistic habit. I often hear SUU students use
this structure with no apparent hesitation.
In fact, this pattern was part of my own family’s language, which is why
I still apply the prescriptive rule somewhat unevenly in speech—a prime
characteristic of prescriptive rules.
2. Put an * after any sentence listed
immediately below that a descriptive grammarian would see as “ungrammatical.”
Explain your reasoning in a few words.
Whither thou goest,
I will go.*
KEY: Ungrammatical in
CONTEMPORARY English. Although a native speaker may well recognize this as
English from the time of the King James Bible, no native speaker would generate
the same sentence now.
I ain’t got no money
KEY: Grammatical among
many dialect groups—both understood and used by native speakers.
Give me a pound of.*
KEY: Ungrammatical in that it is missing
an element that native
speaker would feel compelled to fill in—a pound of what? Note that this structure is “not English” and
is a different kind of problem of the type prescribed against by a PRESCRIPTIVE
grammarian concerned to command native speakers not to end a sentence with a
preposition as in this sentence: Harper
Lee is the writer the critic referred to. Note this sentence doesn’t sound
incomplete, even though it is prescriptively incorrect.
3. Why do Kolln and Funk argue that “Is it correct?” usually is not
the best question to ask about language? What is a better question and why?
KEY: See the discussion
under “Language Variety” in Kolln and Funk 10).
4.
Why does a teacher need to understand both prescriptive and descriptive approaches
to grammar?
KEY: I’m seeking your informed
and opinion here supported by your understanding of the definitions of each
kind of grammar. For a review of Grammar 1, which is described by
Grammar 2 and of Prescriptive Grammar 3, see page 5 in Kolln
and Funk. See also the discussion of
“Language in the Classroom in Kolln and Funk 12-13.
5. Why are all dialects of native speakers considered
equally “grammatical” by descriptive grammarians?
KEY: See pages 3-4 at the
start of Chapter I in Kolln and Funk and the
discussion about “ain’t —especially the last
paragraph that asserts that “every dialect is standard within its own speech
community” (10). Be sure you know what “standard” means and what a “speech
community” is.
6. Circle or underline the form class
words in the following sentence and, using the handout viewed in class, explain
three ways you could have used to distinguish those words from structure
(function) class words:
My very nice dog happily wagged the tip of his tail and barked quite loudly.
KEY: See the form v.
function/structure discussion on pages 229-230 in Kolln
and Funk. Don’t just quote the textbook;
instead, apply the offered explanation to to the words
in the sentence. Example: “Nice” is one of the words that carries the meaning of
the sentence. Additionally, it is an
adjective, as I can see by the fact that it takes the “er”
and “est” word
endings that help us define adjectives and adverbs. (If you want to get fancy, say “inflectional
comparative and superlative affixes.)
7.
What is wrong with each of the following definitions of “sentence”?
A sentence expresses a complete thought.
A sentence is a group of words that begins
with a capital letter and ends with a period
A sentence contains both a subject and a
verb.
KEY: Find the “Phrases
and sentences” slideshow link on the website. Note that the discussion on the
slideshow challenges and enlarges upon Kolln and
Funk.
8. Demonstrate how three linguistic tests that
can determine whether a line is a sentence. Use the following lines in your
demonstration:
The sentence pattern test seemed quite
easy.
Happiness.
Because they had studied
carefully.
KEY: This info is on the “Phrases
and sentences” slide show. Be sure to show the way in which the tag question, I
know that . . ., and question transformation tests work with these particular
sentence.
9. Explain why the following statement is true,
providing an appropriate adverb fragment illustrating your point: A
sentence is always a clause, but a clause is not always a sentence.
Because you are smart, you will do well on the exam.
KEY: The underlined
structure is a clause with a subject (you) and a predicate (are smart), but
because it begins with the subordinator “because,” it is considered a
FRAGMENT—in this case a DEPENDENT ADVERB CLAUSE, not a sentence. See the “Phrases
and sentences slideshow on the class website._
10.
How do you know that the underlined group of words is a phrase?
The dog with very white teeth bit the postal
carrier.
KEY: The word group “with
very white teeth” hangs together as a unit. If I deleted one word of the group
(for instance “with,” I would have to delete the rest of the group as well or
the sentence would no longer make sentence. BONUS: If you are very alert, you
will see that the underlined phase is part of noun phrase that is serving as
subject. How can you tell? You can substitute a pronoun (for instance, “he”)
for the ENTIRE phrase “the dog with very white teeth.”
11.
What are the other phrases in the #10 sentence. Prove
your answer.
KEY: “The postal carrier”
hangs together as a unit. This assertion can be proved if I substitute a single pronouns (for instance, “her”) for the entire
phrase.
14.
What makes a fragment a fragment? What
makes a comma splice a comma splice? Give examples of each.
KEY: Use the Kolln and
Funk index to find the answers for these two concepts. The test may include a
list of sentences with fragments and comma splices that you will be asked to
correct.
Part II: Inflections and derivational
affixes—15 percent of the total exam score
2.1. Why is “ate” considered to be an allomorph of the past tense? List two other such
allomorphs.
An allomorph is a
variation of a common morpheme—in this case the standard past inflection “ed.” “Ate” means “eated”—and
therefore represents such a variation. Two other variations would be “swam”
(which is a variation of
“swimmed” and “shrank (which is a
variation of “shrinked”). See Kolln
and Funk Chapter 11.
2.2 Fill in the chart with the forms
correct in Edited American English and in a few words indicate the rule that
you are following.
|
singular |
sing. poss |
plural |
plural
poss. |
|
Jess (first name) |
Jess’s |
All the Jesses in the world
are smart |
All the Jesses’ years
of study have paid off. |
|
phenomenon |
phenomenon’s |
phenomena |
phenomena’s |
|
child |
child’s |
children |
children’s |
|
cat |
cat’s |
cats |
cats’ |
|
Jones (last name) |
Jones’s |
Joneses |
Joneses’ |
|
deer |
deer’s |
Deer (with the zero allomorph representing
plurality) |
deer’s (since the plural is not formed with an “s,” just add an ’s). |
For
rules for forming possessives, read about nouns and noun phrases in Chapter 12.
2. 3. Separate
the words in the following sentence into a list of their morphemes. Mark
derivational affixes D. Mark the inflectional affixes or their allomorphs INFL
and label them as to type (“noun plural,” for instance).
My gen tle(D) man
ly(D) father, who snore s(INFL—verb 3rd
person singular present) loud er(INFL ADJ comparative) than our em(D) ploy ee(D) s ’(two INFL—noun plural and noun possessive) mow er, en(D) light en(D) ed(INFL—verb
past) us on our uni(D)
vers ity(D) ’s (INFL N-poss) noise regul at(D) ion(D) s(INFL—noun plural).
Note: The “er” in father does not mean “more fath”
or “one who faths”; therefore, it is not considered
to have the discreet meaning that would make it qualify as a morpheme.
2.4.Consider the
following sentence:
John’s magable muchament of a murlish amession is muggering more mabily than my dorfer.
a.
Identify any
noun in the above sentence. Prove that you're right by indicating all possible identifying
inflections and derivational affixes as well as position indicators. DO NOT use
notional definitions in presenting your proof. (In other words, don’t just say that a noun is
a person, place, or thing. Use morphological and syntactical indictors to prove
that the nouns you have identified are indeed nouns.
KEY:
muchament (der affix ment, position
following determiner and adjective)
Ammession (der affix ion, function of object of a preposition, position following determiner
and adjective)
Dorfer (er der affix meaning “one who dorfs), follows determiner “the”
b.
List the
determiners in the above sentence. Label them as to type.
Possessive noun det:
John’s; possessive pronoun determiner, my; article a;
c.
List the
adjectives in the above sentence. Prove that you're right by indicating all
possible the identifying inflections and derivational affixes as well as
position indicators.
Magable—der affix
ble; position between determiner and noun; murlish—der affix ish and
position between determiner and noun.
d.
List the verb
phrase in the sentence, point out its identifying inflectional and derivational
affixes, and finally label it as to tense and aspect (for instance, past
progressive).
is muggering shows the 3rd person singular present “s” inflection in the be-verb “is” and and present participle ing inflection in muggering. Traditional grammarians would identify this phrase as present progressive.
e.
List any adverbs
that appear in the above sentence. Prove that you're right by indicating all
possible identifying inflections and derivational affixes as well as position
indicators.
The “ly” derivational affix combined with the words position following the verb and answering the question “how muggering” indicates its identity as an adverb. Further (but not definitive) evidence shows up in the qualifier “more,” which can appear with adverbs and adjectives.
Part III: Sentence patterns. Review Chapter 3 in Kolln
and Funk, checking all exercises against the answers in the back of the book.
For the exam, you will be given a selection of 10 sentences drawn from the
exercises and examples in Chapter 3 and from the “sentences for practice” at
the back of the chapter. You will be
asked to DIAGRAM all of the sentences as shown at the back of the chapter and
to LABEL all of the words according to this template:
40 percent of the total exam score
1. Label the simple subject as Ns (for noun subject). Label the main verb as MV-lnk (for main verb-linking or main verb-be sentences), or MV-intran (for main verb-intransitive sentences), OR MV-tran (for main verb-transitive sentences).
3. Label ALL other words in each sentence. Use the abbreviations that appear below.
D (for a determiner)
ADJ (for an adjective)
Ns (for the noun OR the pronoun serving as the simple subject)
ADJoc (Adjective objective complement)
ADJsc (Adjective subject complement)
MV-intran
MV-link
MV-be
MV-tran
AUX (auxiliary verb)
Ns (noun subject)
Nadj (noun working as an adjective)
Nadv (noun working as an adverb)
Nio (noun indirect object)
Ndo (noun direct object)
Noc (noun objective complement)
Nsc (noun subject complement)
PPadj (for an adjectival prepositional phrase)
PPadv (for an adverbial prepositional phrase)
P (for a preposition)
Nop (for a noun working as the object of the preposition)
ADV (adverb)
CC (coordinating conjunction)
I/Q (intensifier/qualifier)
Part IV: VERBS—15 percent of the total exam score
See the “verb” sections in Chapters 2 and 12 and review all of Chapter 4
Underline the verb phases in the following sentences; label them using traditional tense descriptions (example: past perfect).
My dog loves garbage. Simple present
He has been eating the neighbor’s coffee grounds. Present perfect progressive
He is eating them now. Present progressive
He ate them yesterday. Simple past
He had eaten them before breakfast. Past perfect
They were delicious. Simple past
Make the second sentence in the above group passive and explain two aspects of the new verb phrase that make it passive.
The neighbor’s coffee grounds have been being
eaten by him. Although this structure is not commonly used, it is
passive in that the old subject and object have switched places in the sentence
and the old subject has been place in a prepositional phrase. The verb has been
transformed to a “be plus past participle Structure.
Part V:
Pronouns/Agreement issues—15 percent of the total exam score
TO CREATE
YOUR OWN KEY, SEE the material highlighted in red and/or the Kolln and Funk pronoun chapter.
5-1.
Circle and label the pronoun and the antecedent in the following sentence and
point out the two ways in which they agree:
Each woman in the class has taught her mother how to
send text messages.
KEY: “Each woman” is the antecedent to which the possessive pronoun
determiner “her” refers.
5-2. What is
case? Illustrate your definition with an example.
.
5-3.
List the cases using contemporary terms and illustrating each with a first
person plural example.
.
5-4.
Describe the following personal pronouns as fully as possible:
He 3rd person masculine singular
subjective
Hers 3rd person feminine singular possessive
Theirs 3rd person neutral plural possessive
Us 1st person neutral plural objective
You 2nd person neutral singular or plural subjective or objective.
Him 3rd person masculine singular objective
I 1st person neutral singular subjective
Yours 2nd person neutral singular or plural
possessive
5-5.
What usage rules govern the use of “who” and “whom”?
Illustrate your answer with two questions. Be prepared to spot errors in a list
of sentences that ask you to correct who/whom errors. Here are some examples:
Whom is coming to dinner tonight? Who is the subject of the question, a fact
that becomes clear if you restate the
question as a statement: Someone is coming to dinner tonight. “Who” is used in
the subject and subject complement positions.
Whom did she marry? Correct: whom is the direct object of
the question, a fact that becomes clear if you restate the question as a
statement: She did marry someone. Whom is used in all object positions.
5-6.
Many of the following sentences show
pronoun/antecedent and/or pronoun/verb agreement usage errors. Correct any errors that you see and explain
the errors in specific terms .
Neither Brazil nor Mexico are raising their oil prices today. KEY: is replaces are and its replaces their. When a compound subject is joined by either/or or
neither/nor, the verb and any pronouns agree with the closest subject—in this
case Mexico.
Neither the students nor the professor
were sorry to see their semester’s work end. Same rule as #1. Were should be is and their
should be his or her.
The band are
unhappy with their latest concert. Collective nouns such as band,
orchestra, team, and jury and treated as a singular when the group is acting in
unison. Are should be is and their should be its.
Students hoped the board of trustees of
the university might withhold their approval of another tuition hike. A board, a business, or a university is
treated as a singular. Furthermore, the verb and any pronoun should agree with
the headword of the noun phrase (board), not with the object of the preposition
(trustees). Therefore, the pronoun should be its, not their.
Everybody should keep their temper.
Everybody should keep his temper.
Indefinite pronouns such
as everybody and each are considered to be singulars by prescriptive
grammarians. However, any correction
should not exclude women or men. Therefore, the possessive pronoun determiners
in each sentence should be replaced by his or her.
Did anyone lose their notes? Should be “his or her notes,” since anyone is also a singular
indicator.
Us lucky travelers missed the storm. The storm missed us
lucky travelers.
1st sentence--We lucky:
we is the subject and should be in the subjective
case.
2nd
sentence--Correct: us is
the direct object and therefore should be in the objective case.
In each case “lucky
travelers” is an appositive.
Between you and I,
this is an easy test.
Between you and me: Between is a preposition and you and me are
its objects and should be in the objective case.
For us English majors, the job market
looks bright. The word us is
the object of the preposition for and should be in the objective case. (English majors is an appositive.)
I am a better grammarian than him.
I am a better grammarian
than he. Even when a sentence containing a comparison is abbreviated
, pronouns should reflect their function in their own clause, which here
is “than he is grammarian.”
We assumed the pilots were they. Correct: subject complements should be
in the subjective case (and “they” is subjective).
The pilots were obviously them.
they: subject complements should be in the
subjective case.
Hemingway’s novels are among my favorites.
However, he can’t exactly be described as a feminist. The pronoun “he” lacks an antecedent, because possessive pronoun
determiners may not serve as antecedents. Rewrite the sentence: Although Hemingway can’t exactly be described
as a feminist, his novels are among my favorites. Now Hemingway is Ns of its own clause and can
serve as antecedent for “his.”
Josh stayed up all night watching all the
episodes of Lost. That made him tired
this morning.
Demonstrative
pronouns (this, that, these, those) must not appear without a specific noun or
noun phrase antecedent. In this case, “this” incorrectly refers to the
situation described in the sentence not to a particular noun phrase. To correct
the error, simply make “that” into a determiner by inserting a noun: That choice made him . . .